Example preventive control plan
This page shows what FoodReport AI produces, using invented data for Northwind Spice Co. (fictional). Nothing here is saved, and opening this page does not create anything in your account.
Illustrative example — not a validated plan or regulatory approval.
A new plan starts as an unreviewed draft. Any template wording it contains still needs your review and approval.
Binder sections
Document state, human review state, and what is still missing are tracked separately. There is no single readiness score, because document completion does not predict a regulatory outcome.
| Section | Document | Human review | Missing information |
|---|---|---|---|
| Company profile | Drafted | Not reviewed | Licence number not entered |
| Approvals & document control | Partly drafted | Not reviewed | No signed approval page |
| Responsibilities | Drafted | Not reviewed | Backup for QA lead not named |
| Hazard analysis | Partly drafted | Not reviewed | 3 hazards have no validated control |
| Supplier control | Drafted | Not reviewed | 2 supplier specifications not uploaded |
| Receiving, storage & transport | Drafted | Not reviewed | Temperature records not attached |
| Traceability | Partly drafted | Not reviewed | Mock recall exercise not recorded |
| Recall plan | Drafted | Not reviewed | Contact list not confirmed |
| Labelling | Not started | Not started | Allergen label verification missing |
| Verification | Not started | Not started | Verification schedule missing |
| Training | Partly drafted | Not reviewed | Training records not attached |
| Corrective actions | Drafted | Not reviewed | No closed-out example on file |
Hazard analysis rows
Severity × likelihood is FoodReport AI's own ranking method to help you sort hazards — it is not a calculation any regulation prescribes. A qualified person decides the final ranking and whether a control is validated.
Approved supplier programme plus certificate of analysis on each lot.
Inline magnet and metal detector with documented checks each shift.
Allergen-aware production sequence plus wet clean and label verification.
Suggested draft wording only — needs a qualified review before use.
Missing information the plan asks you for
- Validated critical limits for the grinding step — we never invent a validated limit.
- Actual monitoring records; the example shows placeholders only.
- Signed approval by your PCQI or competent person.
- Supplier specifications and certificates of analysis.
Source status shown beside guidance
Each source carries its own retrieval and human-review state. Retrieving a page never marks it as reviewed.
All sources & review statusFoodReport AI provides AI-assisted decision support. Regulatory requirements and food-safety decisions should be verified by qualified professionals and against applicable current regulations.